Sunday, January 23, 2011

Short Review: The Good Fairy (1935)

Jan. 23, 2011<br />21. The Good Fairy (1935)<br />Starring Margaret Sullavan, Herbert Marshall, Frank Morgan, Reginald Owen, Eric Blore, Beulah Bondi, Alan Hale, Cesar Romero<br />Screenplay by Preston SturgesBased on the play by Ferenc Molnar<br />Directed by William Wyler<br />Plot: &#8220;A naive girl just out of a cloistered orphanage finds that being a &#8216;good fairy&#8217; to strangers makes life awfully complicated.&#8221; (from IMDb)<br />With a screenplay by Preston Sturges, direction by William Wyler, and fairly high IMDb ratings, I was expecting to like this. However, it bored me to tears. I was counting the minutes until it would end. In fact, I&#8217;m typing this as I watch it. Most of the acting feels hammy and detached. It&#8217;s basically  just a lot of yelling and drawn-out gags that really aren&#8217;t that funny. There&#8217;s also a love story, deception… and did I mention people yelling? Maybe I&#8217;m just not in the mood. I don&#8217;t know.  <br />P.S. Sorry about the bad photo&#8212;it&#8217;s the best I could find. :(

Jan. 23, 2011

21. The Good Fairy (1935)

Starring Margaret Sullavan, Herbert Marshall, Frank Morgan, Reginald Owen, Eric Blore, Beulah Bondi, Alan Hale, Cesar Romero

Screenplay by Preston Sturges
Based on the play by Ferenc Molnar

Directed by William Wyler

Plot: “A naive girl just out of a cloistered orphanage finds that being a ‘good fairy’ to strangers makes life awfully complicated.” (from IMDb)

With a screenplay by Preston Sturges, direction by William Wyler, and fairly high IMDb ratings, I was expecting to like this. However, it bored me to tears. I was counting the minutes until it would end. In fact, I’m typing this as I watch it. Most of the acting feels hammy and detached. It’s basically just a lot of yelling and drawn-out gags that really aren’t that funny. There’s also a love story, deception… and did I mention people yelling? Maybe I’m just not in the mood. I don’t know.

P.S. Sorry about the bad photo—it’s the best I could find. :(

Short Review: Caged (1950)

Jan. 23, 2011<br />20. Caged (1950)<br />Starring Eleanor Parker, Agnes Moorehead, Ellen Corby, Hope Emerson, Betty Garde, Jan Sterling, Lee Patrick, Olive Deering, Jane Darwell, Gertrude Michael, Sheila Stevens<br />Directed by John Cromwell<br />Plot: &#8220;A naive nineteen year old widow becomes coarsened and cynical when she is sent to a woman&#8217;s prison and is exposed to hardened criminals and sadistic guards.&#8221; (from IMDb)<br />Despite looking older than nineteen, Eleanor Parker does a great job showing the slow break-down and hardening  of her character. This is a grim, sad&#8212;and at times, deeply disturbing&#8212;film, but it is also a very solid one.The array of marvelous character actresses each play their parts flawlessly. Such stellar performances, the realistic atmosphere, and very quotable dialogue kept me riveted to the screen. In my opinion, these are the factors that elevate this movie beyond a mere &#8216;camp&#8217; status. 

Jan. 23, 2011

20. Caged (1950)

Starring Eleanor Parker, Agnes Moorehead, Ellen Corby, Hope Emerson, Betty Garde, Jan Sterling, Lee Patrick, Olive Deering, Jane Darwell, Gertrude Michael, Sheila Stevens

Directed by John Cromwell

Plot: “A naive nineteen year old widow becomes coarsened and cynical when she is sent to a woman’s prison and is exposed to hardened criminals and sadistic guards.” (from IMDb)

Despite looking older than nineteen, Eleanor Parker does a great job showing the slow break-down and hardening of her character. This is a grim, sad—and at times, deeply disturbing—film, but it is also a very solid one.The array of marvelous character actresses each play their parts flawlessly. I particularly enjoyed Jan Sterling as 'Smoochie'. The last film I had seen her in was Johnny Belinda, and she is quite different here—even adopting an accent. As the ‘villian’ of sorts, Hope Emerson perfectly nails the role of the cruel and crooked warden, who despite her evil nature is also rather humorous (in a black way). Such stellar performances, the realistic atmosphere, and very quotable dialogue kept me riveted to the screen. In my opinion, these are the factors that elevate this movie beyond a mere ‘camp’ status. ***SPOILERS*** It is hard to imagine that such things could happen as are depicted in the film. Were prisons really that bad that? Could someone like Marie be so falsely convicted? Were wardens actually that cruel? Since this film is based on actual undercover research in a women’s prison of the day, I think it is very probable. I can only imagine that if this film strikes me as sad and tragic today, how much stronger its impact must’ve been when it was first released.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Short Review: Stage Fright (1950)

Jan. 22, 2011<br />19. Stage Fright (1950)<br />Starring Jane Wyman, Marlene Dietrich, Michael Wilding, Richard Todd, Alastair Sim<br />Directed by Alfred Hitchcock<br />Plot: &#8220;A struggling actress tries to help a friend prove his innocence when he&#8217;s accused of murdering the husband of a high society entertainer.&#8221; (from IMDb)<br />I rather liked this one. For some reason though, it seems to be one of the Hitchcock films that doesn&#8217;t get discussed much. I thought it was very entertaining and the surprise twist was very clever. The British setting, lovely recurring piano theme, beautiful lighting, and array of British actors&#8212;such as the amusing Alastair Sim (who nearly stole the film)&#8212;were added bonuses. Marlene Dietrich has an interesting role here, playing almost a parody of herself.  As for Jane Wyman, I&#8217;ve read some opinions that see her as miscast, but I thought that she did a good job. The romance between her and Wilding (he had really odd hair, though) was especially sweet, and I felt like she played the part just right. Although this is a suspense/mystery film, there are a lot of charming and humorous moments. Some feel a bit out of place but most hit the mark in contributing to a satisfying film.  The ending does feel a little abrupt. (I can&#8217;t think of an alternative, though!) In my opinion, this is one that is worth watching. 

Jan. 22, 2011

19. Stage Fright (1950)

Starring Jane Wyman, Marlene Dietrich, Michael Wilding, Richard Todd, Alastair Sim

Directed by Alfred Hitchcock

Plot: “A struggling actress tries to help a friend prove his innocence when he’s accused of murdering the husband of a high society entertainer.” (from IMDb)

I rather liked this one. For some reason though, it seems to be one of the Hitchcock films that doesn’t get discussed much. I thought it was very entertaining and the surprise twist was very clever. The British setting, lovely recurring piano theme, beautiful lighting, and array of British actors—such as the amusing Alastair Sim (who nearly stole the film)—were added bonuses. Marlene Dietrich has an interesting role here, playing almost a parody of herself. As for Jane Wyman, I’ve read some opinions that see her as miscast, but I thought that she did a good job. The romance between her and Wilding (he had really odd hair, though) was especially sweet, and I felt like she played the part just right. Although this is a suspense/mystery film, there are a lot of charming and humorous moments. Some feel a bit out of place but most hit the mark in contributing to a satisfying film. The ending does feel a little abrupt. (I can’t think of an alternative, though!) In my opinion, this is one that is worth watching.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Short Review: The Strawberry Blonde (1941)

Jan. 20, 2011<br />18. The Strawberry Blonde (1941)<br />Starring James Cagney, Olivia de Havilland, Rita Hayworth, Alan Hale, Jack Carson, George Tobias<br />Directed by Raoul Walsh<br />Plot: &#8220;Biff Grimes is crazy about Virginia Brush, but his &#8216;pal&#8217; Hugo Barnstead marries her himself and makes Biff the fall guy for his shady dealings. Though Hugo seems to have everything Biff wanted, Biff learns that having what one wants and wanting what one has can be two very different things.&#8221; (from IMDb)<br />Though the story is very simple (and rather silly), charismatic performers and a charming turn-of-the-century setting carry this film. Cagney gives a characteristically energetic performance, de Havilland is her usual adorable and talented self, Hayworth shines in one of her few comedic roles,  and Carson does a great job of playing the double-crossing friend. I couldn&#8217;t help it&#8212;by the time the credits rolled and I heard the last chorus of &#8220;The Band Played On&#8221; I had a big goofy grin on my face.  

Jan. 20, 2011

18. The Strawberry Blonde (1941)

Starring James Cagney, Olivia de Havilland, Rita Hayworth, Alan Hale, Jack Carson, George Tobias

Directed by Raoul Walsh

Plot: “Biff Grimes is crazy about Virginia Brush, but his ‘pal’ Hugo Barnstead marries her himself and makes Biff the fall guy for his shady dealings. Though Hugo seems to have everything Biff wanted, Biff learns that having what one wants and wanting what one has can be two very different things.” (from IMDb)

Though the story is very simple (and rather silly), charismatic performers and a charming turn-of-the-century setting carry this film. Cagney gives a characteristically energetic performance, de Havilland is her usual adorable and talented self, Hayworth shines in one of her few comedic roles, and Carson does a great job of playing the double-crossing friend. I couldn’t help it—by the time the credits rolled and I heard the last chorus of “The Band Played On” I had a big goofy grin on my face.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Short Review: To Each His Own (1946)

Jan. 18, 2011<br />17. To Each His Own (1946)<br />Starring Olivia de Havilland, John Lund<br />Screenplay by Charles Brackett &amp; Jacques Thery from a story by Charles Brackett<br />Produced by Charles Brackett<br />Directed by Mitchell Leisen<br />Plot: &#8220;A single mother gives up her son, then fights to remain a part of his life.&#8221; (from TCMDb)<br /> <br />I think this film would be classified as a &#8220;women&#8217;s picture&#8221;. I thought it was okay&#8212;very heartbreaking at times and a with sweet ending. Olivia de Havilland is great in her first Oscar-winning role (John Lund I don&#8217;t really care for, though). I guess this film just isn&#8217;t my kind of movie. It seems a little weepy and sentimental to me. I feel like my heart must be made of stone to say that, as this is the kind of movie everyone accuses you of not having a pulse if you don&#8217;t really care for it. But for whatever reason, I just haven&#8217;t been in the mood for these types of dramas lately.<br />P.S. Sorry for the watermarks on the photo. I had a hard time finding a decent picture to accompany this review.

Jan. 18, 2011

17. To Each His Own (1946)

Starring Olivia de Havilland, John Lund

Screenplay by Charles Brackett & Jacques Thery from a story by Charles Brackett

Produced by Charles Brackett

Directed by Mitchell Leisen

Plot: “A single mother gives up her son, then fights to remain a part of his life.” (from TCMDb)

I think this film would be classified as a “women’s picture”. I thought it was okay—very heartbreaking at times and a with sweet ending. Olivia de Havilland is great in her first Oscar-winning role (John Lund I don’t really care for, though). I guess this film just isn’t my kind of movie. It seems a little weepy and sentimental to me. I feel like my heart must be made of stone to say that, as this is the kind of movie everyone accuses you of not having a pulse if you don’t really care for it. But for whatever reason, I just haven’t been in the mood for these types of dramas lately.

P.S. Sorry for the watermarks on the photo. I had a hard time finding a decent picture to accompany this review.

Monday, January 17, 2011

Short Review: Persuasion (2007)

Jan. 16, 2011<br /><br />16. Persuasion (2007)<br />TV movie<br /><br />Starring Sally Hawkins, Alice Krige, Rubert Penry-Jones<br /><br />Directed by Adrian Shergold<br />Based on the novel by Jane Austen<br /><br />Plot:  &#8220;Royal Navy captain Wentworth was haughtily turned down eight years ago as suitor of pompous baronet Sir Walter Elliot&#8217;s daughter Anne, despite true love. Now he visits their former seaside country estate…&#8221; (from IMDb)<br /><br />I wanted to like this movie. I really did. But there were just so many things that contributed to it being a very poor and uneven adaption. Granted, I have not read the book (someday I really should!), but I can identify what did not work here as a movie. The main problem seemed to be a bad script and/or bad direction. The characters and their motivations often felt muddled, flat or unconvincing. I was not a fan of the casting of the two main leads either, and I didn&#8217;t feel like they had sufficient chemistry together.  ***SPOILERS AHEAD*** There are also a lot of things I didn&#8217;t understand: why is she dating her cousin? How does she know how to relocate collarbones? Why does she do so much running? Why is that first kiss so painfully awkward? Why did they not make more of an effort to give the leading lady attractive hair and clothes? Why does she &#8216;break the fourth wall&#8217; and stare creepily at the camera? Etc… This just felt like such a half-hearted attempt.

Jan. 16, 2011

16. Persuasion (2007)
TV movie

Starring Sally Hawkins, Alice Krige, Rubert Penry-Jones

Directed by Adrian Shergold
Based on the novel by Jane Austen

Plot: “Royal Navy captain Wentworth was haughtily turned down eight years ago as suitor of pompous baronet Sir Walter Elliot’s daughter Anne, despite true love. Now he visits their former seaside country estate…” (from IMDb)

I wanted to like this movie. I really did. But there were just so many things that contributed to it being a very poor and uneven adaption. Granted, I have not read the book (someday I really should!), but I can identify what did not work here as a movie. The main problem seemed to be a bad script and/or bad direction. The characters and their motivations often felt muddled, flat or unconvincing. I was not a fan of the casting of the two main leads either, and I didn’t feel like they had sufficient chemistry together. ***SPOILERS AHEAD*** There are also a lot of things I didn’t understand: why is she dating her cousin? How does she know how to relocate collarbones? Why does she do so much running? Why is that first kiss so painfully awkward? Why did they not make more of an effort to give the leading lady attractive hair and clothes? Why does she ‘break the fourth wall’ and stare creepily at the camera? Etc… This just felt like such a half-hearted attempt.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Short Review: Miss Austen Regrets (2008)

Jan. 16, 2011<br /><br />16. Miss Austen Regrets (2008)<br />TV movie<br /><br />Starring Samuel Roukin, Olivia Williams, Greta Scacchi, Imogen Poots, Hugh Bonneville<br /><br />Directed by Jeremy Lovering<br /><br />Plot: &#8220;In the later years of her life, as she&#8217;s approaching the age of forty, the novelist Jane Austen helps her niece find a husband.&#8221; (from IMDb)<br /><br />I don&#8217;t know much about Jane Austen&#8217;s life, but I didn&#8217;t like the character in this film that was supposed to be her. She came across to me as an embittered, shrewish, immature, money-obsessed old maid. I accept that this film is basically a work of fiction, but I just didn&#8217;t understand her character. The film did have an interesting &#8216;feel&#8217; to it and I think we can all relate to some of the uncertainties, regrets, etc. that the characters discuss. Yet it just couldn&#8217;t make up for my lack of investment in what meager story there was. This movie is relatively short and a good enough diversion, but it just never really seemed to get anywhere.

Jan. 16, 2011

16. Miss Austen Regrets (2008)
TV movie

Starring Samuel Roukin, Olivia Williams, Greta Scacchi, Imogen Poots, Hugh Bonneville

Directed by Jeremy Lovering

Plot: “In the later years of her life, as she’s approaching the age of forty, the novelist Jane Austen helps her niece find a husband.” (from IMDb)

I don’t know much about Jane Austen’s life, but I didn’t like the character in this film that was supposed to be her. She came across to me as an embittered, shrewish, immature, money-obsessed old maid. I accept that this film is basically a work of fiction, but I just didn’t understand her character. The film did have an interesting ‘feel’ to it and I think we can all relate to some of the uncertainties, regrets, etc. that the characters discuss. Yet it just couldn’t make up for my lack of investment in what meager story there was. This movie is relatively short and a good enough diversion, but it just never really seemed to get anywhere.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...